| Author |
Message |
lucius
DarkXL Developer
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
|
 Posted: Jan 12, 2010 23:18 Post subject: DarkXL Source Code |
    |
|
In the past I promised to release the DarkXL source code at some future date.
I've made some large strides in getting the next build out - honestly the largest hurdle this project has or will face - so the path to beta seems clear and relatively smooth (not to say there won't be issues, but they will be small relatively speaking).
So once the beta has been released (which isn't the next build but in the near future), I will also release all the source code for DarkXL as promised - after spending some time to clean it up and document it properly. I will continue to work on the project beyond beta and release, including the editing tools, multiplayer and bug fixes, but at that point onward the source will be available to anyone. Hopefully the project will be far enough along to avoid massive forking and clone projects, and the code should be organized and clean enough to actually be useful as well. 
_________________
DarkXL....http://darkxl.wordpress.com |
|
tnoyce
Ree-Yees
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
|
| Posted: Jan 13, 2010 00:11 Post subject: Code Release |
|
|
Lucius,
That is excellent news. I hope that another group can pick it up, and start helping you implement/test things.
_________________
Tim Noyce |
|
Dreadopp
Dianoga
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
|
| Posted: Jan 13, 2010 12:47 Post subject: |
|
|
I am looking forward to the next build.
|
|
The MAZZTer
Death Star
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
|
| Posted: Jan 14, 2010 12:15 Post subject: |
|
|
I recommend Google Code. I've never put anything on there but you get source control and a bug tracker both of which could be incredibly useful.
SourceForge is popular too but I don't think that gives you bug tracking.
_________________
http://www.mzzt.net/ | I am a respectable admin with a respectable sig. |
|
lucius
DarkXL Developer
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
|
| Posted: Jan 15, 2010 02:06 Post subject: |
|
|
The MAZZTer wrote:
I recommend Google Code. I've never put anything on there but you get source control and a bug tracker both of which could be incredibly useful.
SourceForge is popular too but I don't think that gives you bug tracking.
Thanks for the suggestion, but I was planning on using Codeplex since I already use it for feature tracking. If that doesn't work out for some reason (too slow or other issues) then I'll take another look at Google Code.
_________________
DarkXL....http://darkxl.wordpress.com |
|
The MAZZTer
Death Star
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
|
| Posted: Jan 15, 2010 17:35 Post subject: |
|
|
SF does have bug tracking, my bad. It's just buried under other stuff.
_________________
http://www.mzzt.net/ | I am a respectable admin with a respectable sig. |
|
Emon
Ree-Yees
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
|
| Posted: Jan 31, 2010 08:21 Post subject: |
|
|
SourceForge sucks, stick with Codeplex or Google code.
|
|
Gez
Gamorrean
Joined: 05 May 2008
|
| Posted: Mar 19, 2010 19:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Any news on this front?
|
|
|
